4.4 KiB
Implementation Plan: Simple HTTP Auth
Branch: 005-simple-http-auth | Date: October 13, 2025 | Spec: D:/Coding/unisono/specs/005-simple-http-auth/spec.md
Input: Feature specification from /specs/005-simple-http-auth/spec.md
Note: This template is filled in by the /speckit.plan command. See .specify/templates/commands/plan.md for the execution workflow.
Summary
The feature provides a simple HTTP authentication mechanism for the Single Page Application (SPA). Users will be prompted to enter a passphrase, configured via an .env file, to gain access. Access will be preserved for the duration of the browser session. Failed attempts will not be rate-limited, and if the passphrase is missing or invalid in the .env file, the application will default to no authentication. Authentication attempts (success/failure) will be logged to a text file. User management, password reset, and multi-factor authentication are explicitly out-of-scope.
Technical Context
Language/Version: Node.js (LTS), TypeScript 5.x
Primary Dependencies: React, Material-UI / MUI, WebSocket library, Express.js
Storage: Ephemeral server-side storage (in-memory/session store) for encrypted session data, .env file for passphrase.
Testing: npm test
Target Platform: Web (SPA)
Project Type: Web application (frontend + backend)
Performance Goals: No specific target for passphrase validation.
Constraints: Access preserved during browser session.
Scale/Scope: Simple HTTP authentication for a single SPA.
Constitution Check
GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.
The plan aligns with the project constitution:
- I. Conventions: The plan adheres to existing project conventions by using Node.js/TypeScript, React, Material-UI, Express.js, and the established
backend/andfrontend/structure. - II. Libraries/Frameworks: The plan explicitly lists primary dependencies (React, Material-UI / MUI, WebSocket library, Express.js) which are established in
GEMINI.md. - III. Style & Structure: The plan follows the existing
backend/andfrontend/structure and uses TypeScript, aligning with the project's established patterns. - IV. Idiomatic Changes: The plan proposes changes that integrate naturally within the existing web application structure.
- V. Comments: This is a code-level principle, not directly applicable to the plan document itself, but the plan doesn't suggest violating it.
Quality Gates Alignment:
- I. Proactiveness: The tasks include unit/integration and end-to-end tests for both user stories.
- II. Verification (Tests): The plan specifies
npm testfor testing, consistent withGEMINI.md. - III. Verification (Standards): The plan implies adherence to these standards by using TypeScript and
npm test.
Status: All principles and quality gates are aligned.
Project Structure
Documentation (this feature)
specs/005-simple-http-auth/
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
Source Code (repository root)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── models/
│ ├── services/
│ ├── api/
│ └── ws/
└── tests/
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── pages/
│ └── services/
└── tests/
Structure Decision: The project uses a web application structure with separate backend/ and frontend/ directories. The authentication logic will primarily reside in the backend/ for validation and session management, and the frontend/ will handle the passphrase input and display.
Complexity Tracking
Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|---|---|---|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |