docs: amend constitution to v1.1.1 (refine Ruby on Rails as full-stack) and create spec for 010-port-the-app
This commit is contained in:
34
specs/010-port-the-app/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
34
specs/010-port-the-app/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Specification Quality Checklist: Port the app to Ruby on Rails
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||||
**Created**: 2025-10-17
|
||||
**Feature**: ../../010-port-the-app/spec.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Quality
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) - *FAIL: Mentions Ruby on Rails in several places. Improved by removing Docker, WebSockets, and Google Cloud Natural Language API.*
|
||||
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||||
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders - *FAIL: Explicit mention of Ruby on Rails makes it less accessible.*
|
||||
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||||
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||||
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||
- [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) - *FAIL: SC-003 mentions Ruby on Rails application. Improved SC-001 and SC-004.*
|
||||
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||||
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||||
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||||
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||||
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||||
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||||
- [ ] No implementation details leak into specification - *FAIL: Same as content quality and success criteria issues.*
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|
||||
56
specs/010-port-the-app/spec.md
Normal file
56
specs/010-port-the-app/spec.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
# Feature Specification: Port the app to Ruby on Rails
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Branch**: `010-port-the-app`
|
||||
**Created**: 2025-10-17
|
||||
**Status**: Draft
|
||||
**Input**: User description: "Port the app to Ruby on Rails, still run it in Docker"
|
||||
|
||||
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
### User Story 1 - Continued Application Functionality (Priority: P1)
|
||||
|
||||
Users can continue to access and use all existing features of the application without interruption or change in behavior after the port to Ruby on Rails.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this priority**: This is the primary goal of the porting effort – to ensure business continuity and user satisfaction by maintaining all current functionalities.
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Test**: Can be fully tested by verifying all existing end-to-end user flows and features function correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Given** the application is ported to Ruby on Rails and deployed, **When** a user accesses any existing feature, **Then** the feature functions identically to its pre-port state.
|
||||
2. **Given** the application is ported to Ruby on Rails and deployed, **When** a user performs a critical action (e.g., creating a session, submitting desires), **Then** the action completes successfully and data is persisted correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Edge Cases
|
||||
|
||||
- What happens if existing data migration fails or results in data corruption?
|
||||
- How does the system handle increased load or traffic during and immediately after the porting process?
|
||||
- What if certain functionalities or external integrations cannot be directly replicated or have different behaviors in Ruby on Rails?
|
||||
- How are environment variables and secrets managed in the new Dockerized Ruby on Rails environment?
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **FR-001**: The ported application MUST provide all existing functionalities available in the current version.
|
||||
**FR-002**: The ported application MUST be deployable and runnable within a containerized environment.
|
||||
- **FR-003**: The ported application MUST utilize Ruby on Rails as its primary backend framework.
|
||||
- **FR-004**: Existing application data MUST be migrated to be compatible with the Ruby on Rails application's data model.
|
||||
- **FR-005**: The ported application MUST maintain its current API endpoints, their request/response formats, and expected behaviors.
|
||||
**FR-006**: The ported application MUST support existing real-time communication functionality.
|
||||
**FR-007**: The ported application MUST integrate with existing external services as before.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
||||
|
||||
- **User**: Represents an individual using the application, with associated authentication and session data.
|
||||
- **Session**: Represents an active user session, containing encrypted session-specific data.
|
||||
- **Desire**: Represents a user's input or preference, processed and stored by the application.
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||
|
||||
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
**SC-001**: All existing end-to-end tests pass with the ported application, demonstrating functional parity.
|
||||
- **SC-002**: The application's average response time for critical API endpoints remains within 10% of its pre-port performance, as measured by load testing.
|
||||
- **SC-003**: 100% of existing user and session data is successfully migrated and accessible by the Ruby on Rails application without data loss or corruption.
|
||||
**SC-004**: The ported application successfully builds, deploys, and runs in a containerized environment without runtime errors or unexpected restarts.
|
||||
- **SC-005**: User feedback regarding application performance and functionality remains neutral or positive post-port, as measured by user surveys or support tickets.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user