Inactive Sessions Purging designed

This commit is contained in:
aodulov
2025-10-16 12:59:43 +03:00
parent 3a71ac9cc4
commit 319e3221a3
8 changed files with 454 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
# Implementation Plan: Inactive Sessions Purging, Form Data Persistence, and Centralized Snackbars
**Branch**: `009-inactive-sessions-purging` | **Date**: четверг, 16 октября 2025 г. | **Spec**: D:\\Coding\\unisono\\specs\\009-inactive-sessions-purging\\spec.md
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/009-inactive-sessions-purging/spec.md`
**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/commands/plan.md` for the execution workflow.
## Summary
This feature implements automatic purging of inactive user sessions, real-time persistence of unsubmitted form input values using WebSockets, and consistent display of snackbar notifications in the top right corner of the UI.
## Technical Context
**Language/Version**: TypeScript 5.x, Node.js (LTS)
**Primary Dependencies**: React, Material-UI / MUI, WebSocket library
**Storage**: Ephemeral server-side session storage (in-memory/session store)
**Testing**: Jest, React Testing Library
**Target Platform**: Web (browser for frontend, Node.js server for backend)
**Project Type**: Web application (frontend + backend)
**Performance Goals**: Maintain performance and stability for up to 100 concurrent active user sessions
**Constraints**: Session inactivity timeout configurable via environment variable
**Scale/Scope**: Up to 100 concurrent active user sessions
## Constitution Check
*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
### I. Defined Technology Stack: PASS
- Backend: Node.js - PASS
- Frontend: React - PASS
- UI Framework: Material Design 3 (Material-UI / MUI) - PASS
- Containerization: Docker - PASS
### II. UI/UX Consistency: PASS
- All user interfaces MUST adhere to Material Design 3 principles and components. - PASS
### III. Container-First Development: PASS
- All application services and development environments MUST run within Docker containers. - PASS
### IV. Test-Driven Development (TDD): PASS
- New features and bug fixes MUST follow a Test-Driven Development approach. - PASS
### V. API-First Design: PASS
- The backend and frontend are decoupled and communicate via a well-defined API contract. - PASS
## Project Structure
### Documentation (this feature)
```
specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
```
### Source Code (repository root)
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
not include Option labels.
-->
```
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/
tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
├── unit/
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── models/
│ ├── services/
│ └── api/
└── tests/
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── pages/
│ └── services/
└── tests/
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]
ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
```
**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
directories captured above]
## Complexity Tracking
*Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified*
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |